Volkswagen Atlas vs. Atlas Cross Sport: A Detailed Comparison

The Volkswagen Atlas is Germany’s strategic entry into the competitive segment of three-row SUVs, going head-to-head with models like the Nissan Pathfinder, Ford Explorer, and Honda Pilot. Since its debut in 2018, the Atlas has made a notable impact, with sales growing from 61,000 units in its first full year to 81,000 units last year. Despite these impressive numbers, it still lags behind its main competitors, prompting Volkswagen to atlas vs diversify its offerings with the introduction of the Atlas Cross Sport.

Exterior Design and Visual Differences

At first glance, the Volkswagen Atlas and the Atlas Cross Sport appear remarkably similar, sharing the same MQB platform and several design elements. However, a closer inspection reveals subtle yet distinct differences. The Cross Sport, which is slightly smaller, measures 195.5 inches in length compared to the traditional Atlas’s 198.3 inches. This reduction in size is most noticeable from the front doors rearward, where the Cross Sport loses the third row of seats, catering to buyers who prioritize cargo space over passenger capacity.

The Cross Sport SEL Premium model features a 3.6-liter V6 engine, a $395 Aurora Red Metallic paint job, and 20-inch alloy wheels. In contrast, the three-row Atlas SEL Premium with the optional R-Line package boasts a Tourmaline Blue Metallic paint job and larger 21-inch wheels. The R-Line package also introduces a sportier front fascia with a sleek black bumper opening and silver accents, distinguishing it from the more rugged gray lower trim of the Cross Sport.

Interior Comfort and Space

Inside, the Atlas and Atlas Cross Sport are nearly identical, offering a spacious and comfortable cabin with advanced technology features. Both models provide ample room for passengers, but the atlas vs Cross Sport’s two-row configuration translates to more cargo space. The Cross Sport offers 40.3 cubic feet of space behind the second row and 77.8 cubic feet with the seats folded down. The three-row Atlas, on the other hand, provides 20.6 cubic feet behind the third row, 55.5 cubic feet behind the second row, and a substantial 96.8 cubic feet with all rear seats folded.

In terms of rear passenger comfort, the Atlas R-Line includes a screen at the rear of the center console for second-row passengers to control the rear A/C, a feature standard with the R-Line package. The SEL Premium Cross Sport, however, only allows rear passengers to adjust seat heating functions, reflecting the slight differences in available amenities between the two models.

Performance and Driving Experience

Both the Atlas and Atlas Cross Sport offer a smooth and capable driving experience, with the 3.6-liter V6 engine providing robust performance. While the base models of both vehicles come with a four-cylinder engine, the upgrade to the V6 significantly enhances power and driving dynamics. Despite the slightly shorter length and reduced weight of the Cross Sport, the driving feel remains very similar to the traditional Atlas.

Pricing and Value Proposition

When it comes to pricing, the Atlas and Atlas Cross Sport are closely matched. The base Atlas Cross Sport with a four-cylinder engine starts at $30,545, while the three-row atlas vs with the same engine is priced at $31,545, making the latter just $1,000 more expensive. This minimal price difference extends to higher trims as well, where the choice between the two models becomes more about personal preference and specific needs rather than cost.

Conclusion

The Volkswagen Atlas and Atlas Cross Sport cater to slightly different segments of the SUV market. The traditional Atlas, with its three-row configuration, is ideal for larger families needing extra passenger space. The Cross Sport, with its two-row setup and increased cargo capacity, appeals to buyers who prioritize storage over additional seating. Both models share a common DNA, offering a blend of style, comfort, and advanced technology. Ultimately, the choice between the Atlas and the Atlas Cross Sport hinges on individual lifestyle requirements and preferences, as both models deliver excellent value in their respective niches.

Leave a Comment